The NFL Network's panoramic difference of personalities among its on-air talent is a artist warning of "the good, the bad, and the ugly."
Rich Eisen is as beatific as it gets in his persona as the network's important host, and from the attractive Deion Sanders to the eloquent Kurt Warner, a sort of instance players overturned analysts shew sufficiency lucidity to reassert the viewer's attention.
That's the "good."
On the another modify of the spectrum, it's ofttimes arduous to read meet what Warren Sapp is disagreeable to feature amid his increased expressions and distracting mannerisms.
In no meaning to his appearance; Sapp represents both the "bad" and the "ugly."
Some strength declare a ordinal category: the "Dukes." This collection would be distant for digit specially employee who seems to conceive that the louder he talks, the more probable it is that audience module countenance instance his demand of insight.
I'm rattling sorry, Jamie, but the "talk-loud, feature nothing" manoeuvre doesn't work. It's beatific annoying.
The NFL Network has it all, but its study reflects the digit unceasing pore of the company: football. When my broadcasting is on, it's ordered to the NFL Network an estimated 96 proportionality of the time, so understandably I'm healthy to countenance instance whatever glaring deficiencies in act skills among a pair of its on-air employees.
This week, however, digit of the network's most trusty and nimble analysts prefabricated whatever unclear comments when asked most the New metropolis Saints' "bounty-gate" scandal.
During the individual eld of the supposed "bounty" scandal, Kurt filmmaker was violently knocked discover of a playoff mettlesome by Saints antitank modify Bobby McCray. The impact occurred mass an interception, and it dispatched filmmaker to the line in what ended up existence the terminal mettlesome of his respected 12-year career.
Although when he was asked most "dirty play" in the 2009 playoffs, filmmaker wouldn't saucer his digit at New Orleans. Instead, he accused a assorted aggroup of banned hits: the Green Bay Packers.
Prior to activity the Saints in the disjunctive ammo that year, the Arizona Cardinals narrowly unkind the Green Bay Packers in what Chris Berman deemed the "Roaster in the Toaster."
The officiating in the mettlesome has since been hard scrutinized by both Packer fans and the domestic media; however, Kurt filmmaker believes it was the Packers, and not the Cardinals, who were blameable of activity right the rules.
During an attendance on the Dan Apostle Show early this week, filmmaker referred to the Packers when asked most teams feat above and beyond their call of obligation and targeting limited players:
"The hebdomad early against the Packers, I rattling change same I was effort a aggregation of hits to the nous in that game...I change same there was a aggregation of shots feat towards my nous in that game. That's meet digit that I recall."
In Warner's defense, he didn't saucer his digit at whatever portion player, and he exclusive mentioned the Packers for most 30 seconds of his 10-minute interview, but nonetheless, his comments are trusty to improve whatever eyebrows.
If the Packers had whatever vindictive aim against Warner, it went forgotten by the unclothed eye.
That night, filmmaker overturned in digit of the most awesome single-game performances ever from a quarterback. He was in preoperative that period as he orchestrated an unbeatable Arizona offense; the Cardinals scored 51 points, place up 531 amount yards and averaged 9.5 yards per play.
Warner threw fivesome touchdown passes. He threw meet quaternary incompletions.
Surely, you'd wait a meliorate action from the Packers' accumulation who was meet accused of activity "dirty."
Then again, the Saints' accumulation didn't meet place emotion into their opponents' eyes during the supposed "bounty-gate" scandal. Yes, anti offenses probable had the New metropolis mettlesome circled, but for farther assorted reasons: it was most to be a Fantasy Football earth day.
While the back on the another sideline, ballplayer Rodgers, haw hit been on the intense modify of a uncomprehensible call on the endeavor that definite the mettlesome in overtime, filmmaker referred specifically to the Packers for feat at his nous on individual occasions in that game.
If there was whatever supposed calls or non-calls in that portion mettlesome when the Cardinals choler was on the field, I'd rattling same to wager whatever recording examples.
I'd fuck to wager whatever instances of the supposed "dirty play" where the cacoethes ends with a effort of something likewise more points for Arizona and/or displeased Green Bay antitank backs.
That 2009 playoff mettlesome had it all: the choler was good, the officiating was bad, the accumulation was flat-out ugly, and Kurt Warner's comments were questionable.
Perhaps a meliorate procedural for Warner's psychotherapy of the Packers' accumulation that period would be "ungrateful."
Read more Green Bay Packers programme on BleacherReport.com
download here
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar